Football Forum | Ticket Forum | Off-Topic Forum | All

Eddie B 11:49 Thu Mar 15
85% of attempts to get on the pitch were repelled, apparently.

Have a look at this tweet from this twat from the BBC:

https://twitter.com/sistoney67/status/974393355240198145?s=19

"It is estimated stewards repelled 85% of the attempts to get on the pitch @WestHamUtd on Saturday. Trouble wasn't spontaneous. It was planned, involved in excess of 100 people and was co-ordinated through mobile phones"


BULLSHIT!!!

Jasnik 8:26 Fri Mar 16
Re: 85% of attempts to get on the pitch were repelled, apparently.

Think what you people have not factored into these equations if some of the 85% of the attempts were actually made by the people who then got on the pitch.

Sort it OUT!.

Robson 7:46 Fri Mar 16
Re: 85% of attempts to get on the pitch were repelled, apparently.

I fail to see how this reflects badly on the fans. Surely it makes us look more civilised, less like an angry mob putting innocent fans in danger?

Suggesting it is organised should get us more sympathy.

Thanks BBC!

oioi 6:30 Fri Mar 16
Re: 85% of attempts to get on the pitch were repelled, apparently.

Thank god mobiles don't work. Half the upper tier would be texting throughout the whole game.

Mike Oxsaw 6:12 Fri Mar 16
Re: 85% of attempts to get on the pitch were repelled, apparently.

All this fake news is clearly aimed at other than West Ham.

Pretty obvious no one without minimum knowledge of the stadium would accept the organised by mobile phone bit without question, believing it was done "on the fly". After all, THEIR mobile phones work everywhere (except where they don't, like some places in St. Albans, but, *sigh*, that's the English countryside for you.)

As soon as verifiable challenges to that belief surfaces they have to start back-tracking. Questions the validity of all that comes from these people.

Eddie B 6:08 Fri Mar 16
Re: 85% of attempts to get on the pitch were repelled, apparently.

The backtracking now by that BBC journalist would make Michael Jackson proud.

arsegrapes 5:57 Fri Mar 16
Re: 85% of attempts to get on the pitch were repelled, apparently.

I was 4th row from pitch in BML and couldn't see any more attempts from BML or other. Absolute bollocks..

oioi 5:48 Fri Mar 16
Re: 85% of attempts to get on the pitch were repelled, apparently.

The team couldn't get off quick enough, except Arnie who was excellent.

We support them, they could support us.

Bom Stickle 5:46 Fri Mar 16
Re: 85% of attempts to get on the pitch were repelled, apparently.

, 4:16 Fri Mar 16

I have no idea, just going by what was quoted by the ever reliable BBC who got this groundbreaking information from ‘various sources’. Although they changed the article to state all of the pre organised phone shenanigans now happened outside the ground as they probably realised you can’t get a signal inside.

Load of old tripe. 4 people on the pitch and a few hundred singing to Gold and Sullivan and now it’s an organised riot. Without wanting to be overly paranoid but if this happened over Liverpool or Tottenham they’d probably be celebrating the passion of the great fans. Cunts!!!

cuzoftheeast 5:45 Fri Mar 16
Re: 85% of attempts to get on the pitch were repelled, apparently.

Well I know 11 blokes that didn't turn up on the pitch

oioi 5:43 Fri Mar 16
Re: 85% of attempts to get on the pitch were repelled, apparently.

I was at the game and there were NOT another 22 attempts to invade the pitch. I wandered up to the area below the owners for the last 15 minutes of the game and if that was a major disturbance then the world has gone soft. Handbags at worst.

I have to say that if you all want to get out of the stadium then just misbehave at every game, we'll be thrown out soon enough. The RWHFAG claim it's time for revolution, well have one then. What's a 'static demonstration' going to achieve? It's all mouth. As poofy as the popcorn.

mattyolmes 5:01 Fri Mar 16
Re: 85% of attempts to get on the pitch were repelled, apparently.

"It is estimated p
Do me a lemon.
By who?..

Total bull.

Johnson 4:34 Fri Mar 16
Re: 85% of attempts to get on the pitch were repelled, apparently.

You were sure it was the safety lot last night so why don’t you answer that with some direct quotes from them?

, 4:16 Fri Mar 16
Re: 85% of attempts to get on the pitch were repelled, apparently.

Bom Stick, who is saying this our Board or the SAB?

Pub Bigot 3:36 Fri Mar 16
Re: 85% of attempts to get on the pitch were repelled, apparently.

Hahaha! Wankers have changed the story.

I long for the day when that shit organisation comes tumbling down.

Nonce Protection Agency.

JohnnyL 3:27 Fri Mar 16
Re: 85% of attempts to get on the pitch were repelled, apparently.

So who is monitoring people's private mobile phones now?

Bom Stickle 2:32 Fri Mar 16
Re: 85% of attempts to get on the pitch were repelled, apparently.

They have now changed it to say it was organised outside the stadium before the game on mobile phones, hahaha.

ironskej 2:00 Fri Mar 16
Re: 85% of attempts to get on the pitch were repelled, apparently.

my mobile phone never works at the ground

Pub Bigot 1:12 Fri Mar 16
Re: 85% of attempts to get on the pitch were repelled, apparently.

Bomard the BBC calling bullshit.

They're complicit in child rape, left wing propaganda and a lies machine.

Mike Oxsaw 1:11 Fri Mar 16
Re: 85% of attempts to get on the pitch were repelled, apparently.

I'm still trying to get my head around the fact that they accuse us fans of organising all this shit using mobile phones yet communicate with us as though we only read the low end tabloid mainstream press.

Absolutely fucking clueless are our club.

Takashi Miike 11:44 Fri Mar 16
Re: 85% of attempts to get on the pitch were repelled, apparently.

you have to admire their arrogance and continued use of bullshit. you'd think after last Saturday they'd learn but no, ramp it up to new levels

mallard 11:36 Fri Mar 16
Re: 85% of attempts to get on the pitch were repelled, apparently.

Ag @ Kirk

Page 1 - Next